Categories
EdTech University

Unifrog: review

This is the second of three posts. See the first here and the third here.

Unifrog intro

Unifrog was set up in the UK by two individuals with experience of the education context, one of whom was a teacher; this is tacit throughout the system and is one of the systems real strengths in my opinion.

A quick scan of the website belies how UK focussed it has been in its history. All of the testimonials from schools are from UK schools, although the website does point to partner schools all over the world. Many of the tools presented within the system still suggest this UK-centric background – there is a sixth form/college search tool (the use of the word college here could be confusing for American colleagues); there is a UK apprenticeship search tool (international students need not apply); there is a separate Oxbridge tool and an equivalent for other leading unis (Ivy league for example) is conspicuous by its absence.

This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, and Unifrog is adding in more globally orientated features – they are currently developing a global applications shortlist, for example.  Some international schools, with very diverse student bodies, may currently be put off the platform as the current UK focus could well not be seen to fit with their family and student body.

The student side

When students log in they are presented with tools grouped into the following categories:

  • Exploring pathways
  • Recording what you have done
  • Searching for opportunities
  • Making applications

“Exploring pathways” contains tools to allow students to research careers (career library), university subjects (subject library), how to apply to different systems (know-how library) and MOOCs. The former three tools, while not yet complete, are very well developed and give students some very detailed information about these areas. The layout is well designed and engaging, allowing students to also favourite topics that they have seen to bring these to the home page for each tool for ease of reference. The MOOC tool allows students to search for MOOCs that they can take – a really cool feature.

The “Recording what you have done” area includes tools for students to record the activities that they have undertaken and the competencies that they have developed. There is also a section for recording interactions between students and teachers which is gold, particularly if you want your other teachers on your team to be able to see all the discussions that a student has had or if you are worried information being lost.

Both of these sections combined with the CV writer are ideal for getting younger years to think through what they need to do over the final few years of schools to formatively develop themselves in reality and on paper. One of the jobs of the counsellor and the team has got to be about catalysing thinking in the younger students so they don’t end up in their last two years with no experience to reflect on.

The final two sections host tools most useful for the final two years of school. “Searching for opportunities” includes tools to research and shortlist UK universities, UK apprenticeships, College and sixth form, Oxbridge, US universities and European universities. The “making applications” tools include UK personal statement, references, post-18 intentions, UK top 5, CV/Resume writer and common application.

The CV writer and personal statement builders all include good guidance and annotated worked examples to support students in their writing. These are easy to view and real thought has been put into the user experience of these tools.

Note here that research and applications are limited to the UK, US and Europe, but Canada will be being added shortly, and a global applications shortlist feature is in the pipeline.

The teacher side

On using the teacher side it was obvious to me when I first started using the platform that this site had been designed by a teacher, certainly someone who had worked in a school and understood how they worked. In fact, I think that the teacher side is one of the strongest points that the platform has going in its favour and that’s saying something because their careers tools are excellent if UK leaning.

As well as being able to view the student side, teachers have access to two view levels, basic and advanced. The basic view enables teachers to write references, enter predicted grades and view personal statements. The advanced view allows teachers to manage and track students across the whole range of tools that they use. Using this function teachers can comment on what students have done and add interactions to log meeting minutes with them.

The strength of this layout is that I can, say, have a representative from the English department work with the kids on their personal statements and that person is just as easily able to view the students work as me. Of course, if I don’t want anyone else involved I can just train my teachers to only use the basic mode. There is flexibility built in.

One drawback is that teachers have to be added to the system manually, this means someone in the school filling out a spreadsheet and sending it back to Unifrog to add the teachers in. There is no link up with other school MISs.

Once set up though, each teacher can easily provide comments for references for each of their students with one single sign in. There are also exemplars for the teachers showing them how to write references. Everything has been thought of.

Conclusion

Unifrog has a lot of strengths – great layout, intuitive design, ease of use. They have developed excellent career tools, and you can add as many kids, years and grades to the platform as you want at no additional cost, allowing you to get other teachers involved – form/homeroom teachers, for example. The teacher side is also fantastic – simple to onboard teachers and a well thought out system that distinguishes between “basic” and “advanced” utilities, bringing flexibility for those counsellors who want a program that pulls in colleagues or not. Their reference writing areas and cv writing areas are truly excellent, structuring the process for teachers and students as well as providing a clean interface for collecting teacher input and predicted grades for students.

Personally, I have some reservations about the platform. They are currently relatively limited in scope covering Europe and US. Although they will be adding Canada shortly, and a global applications shortlist is the pipeline, there is currently no flexibility here to add other universities.

I also feel that presenting all the data to students in one list may well be a little overwhelming to many students and actually hinder their progress in finding future options – no counsellor or student has time to go through all the university options available, although being able to set your own filters is a nice feature.

All in all, l think that for the right school this is an excellent platform, particularly currently for UK based or out looking schools. You will get great customer service and a very friendly team to work with along with some very developed career advisory tools and systems to reduce the counsellors time on admin and increase their time with students.

Well that’s was over 500 words!

3 replies on “Unifrog: review”

Message from Unifrog dated 8th May 2018

Hi Will,

I wanted to thank you for your blog article – I had a read today of the various posts you have published and it’s fantastic to have a counsellor so engaged with tech, even more-so someone who writes about it.

It was a good reminder for me to update you on the current POA.

You mentioned a few already:

Global Applications List – manually shortlisting any institution anywhere in the world.

Application Tracking – staff see at a glance a colour coded indication for the status of each element of an application to the US. Counsellors sign off on every individual element. Document, portfolios, videos, links to ZeeMee can be uploaded to a student’s ‘Locker’, or content can be pulled from Unifrog tools directly – the Common App writer, PS writer and very soon Supplementary essay writer.

Canadian Searching – Live towards the end of May. Comparing and viewing different faculties, screenshots attached.

Hong Kong and Australia – the next two destinations. Expected 10 weeks and 16 weeks respectively. We are opening an office in Hong Kong in September. Two members of staff based there full-time.

Key Dates – staff can set tasks and deadlines which appear on a ‘planner’ style box at the top of the student homepage. In addition, students can opt-in for key dates pertaining to particular country’s applications. For example if a student indicates interest in Canada, we will show them automatically those deadlines and open day dates.

Data visualization – Our biggest project right now is developing how we import historical data from Naviance and how we choose to display any history data. We will have the typical scattrgrams with SAT and also IB grades. However we will also show other visual formats.

Know – How Library – Already live however I feel that it will become one of the strongest features of Unifrog. We are working with counsellors in the community to create guides and articles about applying to different countries for university and what is required.

Very disappointed. Have used it for a year now. Some information that students based their research on was out of date so they missed the deadlines. Created more work for the teachers. Expensive. Not suitable for France. The site decides whether the choice of a university is feasible for a student in many cases it was wrong and unfortunately put some students off despite the fact that the university was well within their capabilities. Do not recommend – I advise the use of specific platforms such as UCAS etc or the university website.

Hi Eric, thanks for posting. Please note that this review is very out of date now – 2018. Perhaps you should take some feedback to unifrog as it seems like you have some very valid complaints.

Please share your thoughts..

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.